amitdas91 said:
tell me how it was debunked... are you telling me the reporter or asaki got it wrong....
This is actually the first time I've seen a Honda engineer quoted on this issue, and it is something that I have believed based primarily on a test I ran some time ago where I had about a quarter tank of 87 octane in the tank and ran a full throttle run between two marked lines on a freeway offramp. Then, I filled up on 92 octane, drove around for a while to make sure the gas had gotten through the fuel system to the engine.
I reran that same acceleration run, now with an extra hundred pounds of fuel, on the same night and under the same conditions, and got to the second line going a couple of MPH faster.
I can also consistently rip off 7.2 to 7.3 second 0-60 runs on premium fuel, and the performance is noticeably better, by my seat-of-the-pants meter, than when running 87 octane.
The '05 is likely not much different, so if I had to guess, I'd say you will also experience more engine output with the higher octane gas.
Just as an aside, I had a bad experience with Shell gas many years ago and have totally sworn off it. It's amazing how deep these kind of convinctions can run.
Wayne