Honda can do all they want to try to minimize the effects of VCM, whether it's only run deactivated cylinders for a certain amount of time, tune it to activate less, whatever. Key word is all they've been doing is making it run less, indicating that it running is a problem. They've even pretty much advertised this with the software update they had a bulletin for years ago that tuned the system to activate less. If it's such a good system why is activating it for longer periods of time causing a problem? The fact that you assumed my 2006 even has VCM tells me all that I need to know, really. I honestly don't care about your 2006. Makes it strange you care so much about the 5th Gen that you don't even have.
Doesn't matter how you do it, a V6 running on 3 cylinders is not a recipe for success, and if you don't believe me, go disconnect your rear 3 coil packs, start the engine, and see for yourself.
VCM-3 isn't even close to being the same as pulling the coils.
The vacuum issue cannot be addressed without completely changing the implementation of VCM. This has been an issue ever since it was introduced and nothing about it now is different. By leaving the valves closed and never opening them, there is a vacuum being drawn in the combustion chamber and that is the source of many of the issues.
Actually there isn't a vacuum, quite the opposite. The valves are closed on the bottom compression stroke so there is actually air pressure in the cylinder which acts as an air spring to reduce pumping losses, just like I posted above. The goal is to reduce pumping losses on the cylinders not providing power, a vacuum would increase pumping losses.
All Honda has done with VCM-3 is use it less so that the issues never have a chance to develop.
Glad we agree that no issues have developed.
Don't et me wrong, I am not saying VCM1 and VCM2 are good in any way and have caused lots of problems and should be Muzzled. GM had lots of problems whith theirs also. I am only saying the VCM3 hasn't been a problem.